Victims and Lawyers (Or: He Who Pays the Piper …)

good-choice-bad-choice

Some form of legal representation is an excellent idea when negotiating with institutions who’ve harmed you. There are, however, certain difficulties that may arise. While the majority of the legal profession may act completely ethically, unfortunately there will always be rogue operators who do not necessarily act in the best interests of their clients in dealing with institutions responsible for child abuse.

Lawyers owe a duty of care to their clients. While there are many fine lawyers who act for people engaging in compensation negotiations with institutions, sadly, not all act in ideal ways. Over the years, I’ve heard of instances in which lawyers / law firms have engaged in conduct such as:   

  • Overcharging.
  • ‘Talking big’ at the beginning of the relationship, before a retainer agreement is signed, and then pursuing the client for fees when the client refuses to accept an offer from an institution that is substantially lower than the sort of outcome discussed in the ‘honeymoon period’ in which the lawyer is signing the client up. In some cases, clients have even ended up worse off than they were before they signed up the lawyer because the lawyer has not been able to achieve a better outcome than what the institution initially offered, but the client has ended up with less because they have to pay the lawyer’s fees out of the settlement!
  • Consciously or unconsciously acting more in the interests of the institution than the client. 
  1. Conscious conduct may include receiving financial payments from institutions in out-of-court negotiations to convince clients that the maximum payout achievable is what the institution is offering, when in fact a court settlement may well lead to a far higher payout. 
  2. Unconscious conduct may occur when a lawyer has had or intends to have ongoing dealings with an institution, and is less than ideally vigorous in pursuance of their client’s interests. This may be because at the back of their mind is a desire to maintain relatively harmonious relationships with the institution and its legal representatives to facilitate easier dealings in the future. This problem may only become apparent when the client becomes more assertive with the lawyer when resisting acceptance of a low payout from an institution and is pressured into accepting it. 
  • Engaging in conduct designed to manipulate the client into accepting a low offer from an institution. For example, years ago, I spoke with a man who’d engaged a solicitor on ‘spec’. This man was in a dire financial situation. The solicitor lent him money from her own reserves to ‘tide him over’ until a satisfactory settlement was obtained from the institution. When a ridiculously low offer was made by the institution (much lower than anticipated) and this man refused to accept it, the solicitor became very pushy about the man accepting the offer so she could be paid back. He ended up accepting it because he valued his good name (he was in business) and was afraid that she would speak negatively about him as a person who reneged on his debts.

When engaging a lawyer or law firm, you should be aware of your rights and keep your eyes wide open. Don’t be afraid to ask questions. Don’t be afraid to talk about what you expect from your lawyer. Consult widely and speak to a number of lawyers before settling upon one. Talk to other people who’ve had dealings with the lawyer or law firm you’re considering retaining and see what they have to say about outcomes received. Examine the retainer agreement you’re given and if you don’t understand anything in it, or want to change something in it, don’t be afraid to raise this with the lawyer. Resistance to a reasonable request may be an early warning sign that you’re not going to have a good outcome with this lawyer or firm.  

Remember: Your lawyer / law firm is there to act in your best interests; not their own, and not those of others!

Finally, if you encounter a problem of any of the types outlined above, or just want a bit of guidance, there are bodies / resources that exist to help you. For more information, see these links:

Aletha Blayse

Web: http://www.lewisblayse.net

Web: http://www.whiteshieldappeal.org

Twitter: @alethabe

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION: HELP OBTAIN JUSTICE FOR LEWIS BLAYSE FROM THE SALVATION ARMY.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Victims and Lawyers (Or: He Who Pays the Piper …)

  1. Pingback: Victims and Lawyers (Or: He Who Pays the Piper …) | Christian Reforms

  2. David Patterson says:

    Hi Althea

    Nice article

    I have had some experience with this 🙂

    ( he says wishing he had not )

    I’d suggest the people best qualified to speak on our behalf are ourselves

    And that the others are best as support ..like a coach’s role in a sporting team

    Also if they are not prepared to give a few words of advice for free …I have found you waste your money

    look for these ones .. keep looking till you find them ..they are out there

    In plainer terms

    A dollar spent on lawyers is a wasted dollar ..

    My mother’s family are from Sydney … Tomkies /Lanceley

    After a bitter legal tussle in the mid eighties involving the later Governor of Qld as my Lawyer – Ms L Forde … going out with Angus ( Black Angus ) Mcdonald ex NSW police

    at this time ..

    ..and on the other side KIOWA #4 a Discretionary Trust set up with..an accountant Fred Murrell and a barrister – ex head of the NSW law society Mr Raphael

    Both Ms Forde and a Mr Maitland of Stephen Jaques who we engaged were of the opinion nothing could be done because of who we were up against

    After some time and discussions I was able to eventually register the shares in the company ..North Sydney Brick and Tile Co Ltd / Norwest… left to me by my grandmother – Mary Ann Tomkies

    All the money I spent on lawyers was wasted … $10k except to the extent that it reveled I had to act myself

    If the situation was to change from where Murrell and Raphael were giving themselves 50 grand a year each to fill in and sign the tax return

    and brush off any pesky beneficiaries

    Best wishes Dave

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s